|
|
Nickolai Vladimirovich KUPRYAEV - Leading engineer of TK "PHOTON" of the PIAS Samara BranchNickolai Vladimirovich KUPRYAEV, was born in 1962 in Kuibishev prov. In 1994 finished Samara State Univercity, on physicist profession. In present time he works in Samara Branch of PIAS at a position of scientific assistant. |
FUNDAMENTALS OF THE THEORY OF ANISOTROPIC SPACE
Fundamentals of the theory of the anisotropic space based on modified Lorentz transformations 
are given. These new transformations explain Michelson-Morley's experiments and Maxwell's electrodynamics, but without postulation of invariance of velocity of light. Lorentz's modified transformations in contrast to Lorentz's transformations 
does not lead to any paradoxes and contradictions. They transform to classical Galilee's transformations 
at 
. The proposed transformations allow explaining the anisotropic phenomena. Some experiments are proposed to check this theory.
WHETHER SATISFIES THE RELATIVISTIC TRANSFORMATION OF THE MOMENTUM THE CORRESPONDENCE PRINCIPLE?
It is shown, that the conventional relativistic transformation of the momentum does not shade into classical transformation of the momentum at small speeds.
WHETHER SATISFIES THE LORENTZ TRANSFORMATIONS THE CORRESPONDENCE PRINCIPLE?
It is shown, that the conventional Lorentz transformations do not shade into Galilean transformations at small speeds.
MICHELSON-MORLEY EXPERIMENT AND THE CLASSICAL MECHANICS.
It is proved by the classical Galilean transformation, that the Michelson-Morley experiment cannot be explained on the basis of the nonrelativistic classical mechanics. It can be explained by STR or the theory of the motionless light-guide ether with a conserving light-like interval only. And all numerous attempts to explain the Michelson-Morley experiences on the basis of the nonrelativistic classical mechanics by the confusing schemes and figures, which have captivated all bookshops and Internet recently, contain basic mistakes and are doomed.
ABOUT THE CONTRADICTION IN THE RELATIVISTIC DESCRIPTION OF THE DE BROIGLE WAVE.
It is shown, that the wave hypothesis of the de Broigle wave contradicts STR. So the relativistic length of the de Broigle wave for moving particle is infinity in the reference system, moving together with a particle. This fact is false even qualitatively. Discussed contradiction is basic and cannot be overcame within of STR. But it is overcame within of the theory of the motionless light-guide ether and Gryzinski atom physics.
THE METRICS OF THE "ACCELERATED" REFERENCE SYSTEM IN STR.
It is shown, that metrics accelerated moving reference system as well as the metrics of inertial reference system in STR is defined by metric tensor generated by the constants Galilean component. The commonly accepted idea about non-Euclidean geometry in the accelerated reference system is result of the usual nonrelativistic (instead of relativistic) transformations, which are not relevant to STR, and it is casual annoying misunderstanding. So, the conventional geometrical interpretation of space-time "curvature" in STR as the reasons of gravitation is also misunderstanding.
It is shown that the expected frequence shift of two opposite waves in N.V. Kravtsov and V.V. Ragul'sky's experiment with use of the ring laser, in one arm of which there is a condensed medium with a refractive, and which is designed by the authors for search of a possible spatial anisotropy of velocity of light, is equal to zero, even at presence of the anisotropy of light velocity.
CRITICAL REVIEW OF G.B. MALYKIN ‘S WORK " SAGNAC’S EFFECT. CORRECT AND INCORRECT EXPLANATIONS ".
It is shown, that in criticized work [1] a difference of times of propagation
for opposing waves in a rotating reference system 
is
responsible for Sagnac’s effect, instead of the size 
measured in
laboratory reference system 
. In this work
transformation of time from laboratory system 
to a rotating
system 
is not executed absolutely correctly. Thus, it leads to incorrect
interpretation of Sagnac’s experiences. It, probably, has allowed the author of
work [1] to consider Sagnac’s effect as effect of STR only and introduction of
the motionless light-guide ether as excessive and erroneous. So, instead of
Lorentz's transformation 
as it is
necessary in STR, the transformation 
being has
been used. The last transformation is special case of Lorentz transformation of
time for case when the time in a rotating system 
is taken by
the same hours located in same point of space.
CRITICAL REVIEW OF O.E. AKIMOV’S TEXTBOOK " NATURAL SCIENCES. THE LECTURES ".
The author of the textbook, being in a captivity of own errors, has deformed physical sense of the classical formula of Doppler’s effect and on this basis has subjected to the most severe criticism not only the relativistic physics, but also the world fundamental classical physics on which the modern science keeps. Actually with classical formulas of Doppler’s effect is all right everything.
CRITICAL REVIEW OF A.A. LOGUNOV’S BOOK " H. POINCARE AND THE THEORY OF THE RELATIVITY"
It is shown, that the twelfth paragraph of the book devoted to the relativistic accelerate motion, paradox of hours and Sagnac’s effect is erroneous and not relevant to STR.
It is shown, that the ways of synchronization of the hours separated in space proposed by G.B. Malykin: by two mechanical elements rigidly connected together (mirrors, îáòþðàòîðû or “san-spots" of the any nature having superlight speed) do not give possibility to compare the speed of light in direct and opposite directions and can not serve for evidence of isotropy for speed of light. H. Poincare's statement about basic impossibility of measurement of speed of light for opposite directions remains, apparently, true.
TO THE QUESTION ON THE SEASONAL ANISOTROPY OF THERMAL NEUTRONS NEAR TO THE SURFACE OF THE EARTH.
It is come out with the assumption, that observed by authors [1] within several years periodic with the period one year change of a direction of a stream of thermal neutrons near to a surface of the Earth has the kosmo-physics nature probably. The stream is directed in the winter time to a surface, and in summer - from a surface of the Earth. The schedule of anisotropy presented by authors [1], reminds a smooth sinusoid without the step corresponding to the season when the surface of the Earth is free from a snow. If the "snow" hypothesis of authors [1] is true, the extended step should be visible on the schedule, beginning, at least, April and finishing October. To confirm or rule out this assumption it is necessary for authors [1] to find the possibility to continue these researches further and to measure a stream of neutrons, for example, within day. Or, as a last resort, to try to allocate from an available data the daily fluctuations of a stream. If the kosmo-physics hypothesis of the phenomenon is true, the same periodicity (with the period 24 hours) in change of a direction of a stream of neutrons should be observed within day, apparently. There is a large number of works in which informe about daily and annual waves for the different processes, beginning from chemical processes and finishing nuclear and cosmological processes.
VORTICAL OPTICAL SAGNAC’S EFFECT.
It is shown, that experimentally observable Sagnac’s phenomenon contradicts with special (and also the general) the theory of a relativity. Calculation of size of Sagnac’s effect in the framework of the relativistic theory leads to paradox. So, for the moving relativistic observer, simultaneous events of meetings ± beams with a source are non-simultaneous for events of meetings of a source with ± beams. Here the index "+" marks a beam propagating in a direction of motion of the observer, and by an index "-" a beam propagating against motion. The paradox is resolved in the framework of the theory of the motionless light-guide ether.
THE EXPANDED REPRESENTATION OF THE LORENTZ TRANSFORMATIONS
The expanded variant of the solution of the generalized Lorentz transformations (the particular solution is the Einstein special theory of a relativity ), in which the speed of light c is noninvariant but aeolotropic. Invariant is experimentally registered physical size c-1 (time) for a quasi-closed trajectory of light. The theory explains vortical Sagnac's effect and negative result of the Michelson-Morley -type experiments.
THE ANALYSIS OF THE GENERALIZED REPRESENTATION OF LORENTZ-TRANSFORMATION
The transformation: 
obtained from
the generalized Lorentz-transformation:
, where 
,
, satisfying the Michelson-Morley-experiments and Maxwell's
electrodynamics without postulation of speed of light-invariancy is analyzed. In
the suggested approach speed of light is aeolotropic in moving reference system.
